My dictionary defines the word chaos as “utter confusion.” It has yet to be proven that chaos even exists in the universe. If everything can be represented through numbers and mathematics, then everything has an order to it. Everything that exists and everything that happens is formulaic. Everything that happens is for a reason. Reason and logic can be represented mathematically. So if chaos does not really exist in the universe, how could it exist in art?
If a child scribbles lines on a paper, it is said to be a totally random act, that has no merit for analysis and was done without any preconception or thought. This would not be a correct assumption. The child was thinking when he/she scribbled on the paper, so the lines in some way represent the child’s thoughts consciously or sub-consciously. Another myth is that the act of war creates chaos. Although the repercussions of a military invasion or attack on a city may seem chaotic, actually it is not. The invasion was carefully plotted out and analyzed by military personnel. The people who planned the attack developed complex scenarios that were explored before the attack was implemented. The military chose the outcome that they wanted, and hoped for the best (or worst). The situation that appears to be chaotic is the aftermath. The aftermath is simply a consequence, or the end result of the attack or invasion. The violence and suffering is thought out in advance. The victims may think there is chaos, but the so-called chaos was actually planned.
In art, chaos does not exist either. There have been many art movements and artists who attempted to represent it, but because it does not exist, they have not succeeded. The most beautiful art can be described in two words. Simple order. Art that is orderly and simple is also the hardest to design. Look at music for instance. What is more appealing to most people’s ears? Complex prog rock, or a three chord ballad? Most people would respond better to the 3 chord ballad. Complex prog or “math rock” may appeal to some, but not most. Besides, even that must be programmed to a pattern, it is just more complex. It is also easier to create because it gives the songwriter more options. Because he has more chords to work with, there are also less rules or instructions he must follow. The instructions or musical theory he is using to compose his song is much more open. He is not so rigidly tied down. Because he has more input, he can make the song any way he likes, as long as it follows a pattern. If it did not follow a pattern, it would not be a song. It need not sound a certain way. A three chord ballad has far more rules and instructions for composition. It is essentially a formula. When one must create within the constraints of a mathematical formula using a limited amount of numbers it becomes more difficult. It offers less artistic freedom, and is more like a puzzle.